Reading Past the Headlines: What Q3 Growth Really Tells Us

By: Anthony Morales

A 4.3% annualized GDP growth rate in the third quarter immediately sounds like a strong result. In a macroeconomic environment of elevated interest rates, strained financial conditions and ongoing policy uncertainty, this growth signals positive momentum. From a macroeconomic perspective, however, headline GDP numbers only tell part of the story, and what really matters is where that growth came from and whether it is sustainable or a temporary boost.

According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, Q3 growth was driven by increases in consumer spending, exports, and government spending even as investment lagged. Consumer spending remained the largest contributor, growing at an annualized rate of 3.5%. Growth remained resilient despite a cooling labor market and modest real wage gains. However, spending growth continues to tilt toward services rather than goods, with services growth rate at 3.7% and goods growth at 3.1%, suggesting normalization in demand rather than a renewed consumption surge. In the long run, consumption can sustain short-term growth, but it does not mean that the economy’s productive capacity will follow.

Another encouraging long-term contribution came from nonresidential fixed investment, particularly in equipment (5.4%) and intellectual property products (5.4%) which coincides with consistent growth in capex seen through 2025. This matters because investment, unlike consumption, increases productive capacity and fuels future growth. Firms do not increase capex unless they see expectations of sustained demand, supportive domestic incentives, and productivity gains. In that sense, investment growth in these sectors sends a more forward-looking signal than consumer spending alone.

That said, the investment picture is not across the board uniformly strong. While equipment and IP investment continue to grow, structured investments (-6.3%) and residential investments (-5.1%) remain weak. This reflects higher financing costs and uncertainty around long-term projects. This uneven investment profile suggests that the economy is still adjusting to an economic environment with higher rates rather than a full acceleration into expansion. If investment continues to concentrate on technology and AI rather than physical expansion, growth may remain robust but uneven.

Exports also contributed positively to Q3 growth (8.8%), rebounding after a weaker performance earlier in the year. The improvement was driven by steady global demand, a weaker dollar, and a more favorable trade environment relative to previous FY25 quarters, which helped lift US exports. As a result, exports provided a meaningful boost to GDP, helping offset uneven domestic investment conditions.

Looking ahead, the sustainability of growth will hinge on how these figures evolve through the rest of the year and FY26. Consumption is likely to moderate as US savings rates decline, and the labor market continues to cool. If that slowdown continues to remain gradual, then it would represent normalization in economic conditions rather than a structural weakness. The most important question for the future of the US economy is whether investment can take a larger role in carrying growth.

This dynamic has clear implications for monetary policy. Q3’s 4.3% growth gives the Federal Reserve room to continue easing cautiously, particularly with continued signs of labor market softening. While strong headline growth reduces the urgency for aggressive rate-cutting, the composition of growth, especially lagging investment suggests certain financial conditions have remained restrictive. From a macroeconomic standpoint, the Fed is navigating a path, easing just enough to support continued full employment and capital formation while remaining focused on stubborn inflation.

For the rest of the year, the US economic outlook looks less like an economic renaissance and more like a controlled transition. Growth is positive, but increasingly dependent on productivity-driven investment, especially in AI rather than overall demand. If capex broadens beyond its current narrow scope and feeds into productivity for workers, today’s growth can be more durable. If not, headline GDP may cool as the economy remains unstable.

The key takeaway from Q3 is that the 4.3% growth is a checkpoint, not a destination. It shows that the economy can perform under tighter conditions, but whether that growth can translate into a strong long-term trajectory will depend more on capital flows and less on consumers.

 

gdp3q25-ini.pdf

Previous
Previous

Was the Venezuela Operation legal? Executive Power and the Constitutional balance.

Next
Next

Understanding the Economics of Chicago’s Head Tax Proposal